At the start of this week we had a contextual studies workshop, which was meant to help us with our research by encouraging us to look at artists/designers from different time periods. During this workshop I came across the work of Georgia O'keeffe, an American artist best known for her paintings of enlarged flowers, New Mexico landscapes and New York skyscrapers. She lived between 1887 and 1986, playing a huge part in the American modernist movement. Soon after 1918, she began working primarily in oil, a shift away from working mainly in watercolour. By the 1920's O'Keeffe began creating large scale paintings of natural forms at close range, as if seen through a magnifying lens. Her work had been mostly abstract, but works such as "Black Iris III" (1926) prompted people to believe that her subject was a veiled representation of female genitalia
while also accurately depicting the centre of an iris.
O'Keeffe consistently denied the validity of Freudian interpretations of her art. The fact that many people at the time thought O'Keeffe's paintings were of something other than what she intended emulates her ability to transform her subject into something else. She therefore turns something from its "real"/original state into a "fantasy"/untrue form.
The foreground image in this painting obviously resembles leaves however the layered leaves in the background makes the viewer question O'Keeffe's subject. The brighter lighting in the foreground in comparison to the darker background may lead the viewer to believe that the leaves are falling down an abyss or a portal into another world.
The close up nature of O'Keeffe's paintings also make her subjects i.e.flowers or leaves look like separate landscapes. These therefore could be interpreted as a "fantasy" world within the "real" world, further relating Georgia O'Keeffe's work to my theme of "Fantasy verses Reality".
I thought O'Keeffe's work might be useful in helping me to create more designs/experimentations. In response to her work I decided to make some rubbings of leaves from my garden and experiment with how I could use these to create imagery. Like I did with previous designs, I decided to scan the leaf rubbings and layer them on photoshop with another image. I came across this colourful image of flowers that I took whilst on holiday in easter and repeatedly copied and pasted the image of the leaf onto the picture of the flowers setting the layer blending options to "difference" each time. I also experimented with using the "difference" layer blending option using the image of flowers with a plain background. The resulting image over exposed each of the flowers, seemingly revealing their inner skeleton, almost echoing O'keeffe's close up perspective and "magnifying" technique.
After adding the first two or three leaves to the image I wasn't sure wether I should add more and try to cover the whole page or just leave it how it was as the irregular shape of the layered leaves added to the aesthetic of the picture. With the picture as it was at this stage in its development it was almost as if the outline of the leaves created a window in which the original image was distorted. I liked how the multi layering of leaf rubbings in some areas of the picture created various sections of differing transparency around the image.
I continued to layer more leaf images and ended up with the image above, still leaving small traces of the original flower image around the picture. I liked this version better than the partially collaged one as it is fuller and therefore gives the viewer more to look at. I also thought it was interesting how when I added two layers of leaf images with the layer blending options at difference it were almost as if I could see right through to the original image however the colours and shapes were much more faded and distorted.

I experimented with this image further by layering it with yet another image of a muddy puddle with a reflection in it, which I used earlier on in my project. This ultimately made the image much darker whilst also adding different textures to the image. I particularly liked the effect the reflection of the tree branches had when layered with the purple/pink sections of the image as it was almost as if they cut paths or veins into the image, seemingly making the print come alive.
After having done a number of image making experiments, I wanted to test my prints on different fabrics using different methods. I got some heat transfer paper off amazon that you can print on using any normal inkjet printer you have at home. I decided to experiment with my most recent image first and printed the whole image to the size of the A4 heat transfer paper.
I first experimented with printing it onto organza, a thinner more porous material, which was probably not the smartest thing, but I wanted to see if it would work and end up being see-through like when I experimented with printing on tracing paper.
This didn't work very well as after I had removed the paper I had to then quite forcefully pull the printed organza off the canvas bag I had ironed on top of to protect my work surface. The design seemed more or less ok but various sources had said to use the silicon paper the heat transfer paper package provides to finish the design. Alternatively you could use paper to absorb any excess ink and leave a softer finish, so I decided to do this. However when I came to pull the paper off after ironing it partially stuck to the material and ruined the design.


After this I tried printing on some silk-satin that my mum had lying around as I thought it might give the image an interesting shine, however the material turned out very stiff and ridged, probably because by applying the print this way I was ultimately applying a coat of plastic onto the fabric.
This was not the type of finish I wanted for my designs so I decided that the only way to achieve the quality I wanted for my final outcomes was to use the fabric printing facilities at Ravensbourne.




















